Carlos Bernard (24‘s Tony Almeida) joined former co-star Mary Lynn Rajskub (Chloe O’Brian) in the first episode of her “Kicking It Mary Lynn Style” podcast. He expressed doubts on whether a 24 movie would even be relevant in the current landscape.
Do you think a movie is even relevant at this point? Like if the show came back on, do you think… It’s almost like it was of a certain time period, don’t you think? I don’t know the answer to it, I’m just curious about it.
It seemed like the show really almost seemed like it was a Bush-era kind of show where terrorism was always [a thing]. Terrorism is not on the top of peoples issues anymore – it’s almost like we’re past the terrorist time. Osama bin Laden has been caught, the whole al-Qaeda network is falling apart; they’re just decimating it right now. It’s just sorta like, is it still an issue?
The actors go on to discuss Homeland and agree that show is great primarily because of the personal stories rather than simply hinging on the ‘ticking time bomb’ scenario of an imminent terrorist threat. It’s an interesting discussion for sure and something that has been mentioned by critics in the past.
You can listen to the full podcast here which runs a little over an hour. There’s not a whole lot of 24 discussion but Carlos briefly talks about convincing the writers to spare Tony’s life in the fifth season premiere, and his favorite Almeida scene (his interrogation at the FBI in the 24 Season 7 premiere).
11 Comments
Comments ClosedGerry Mander
July 19, 2012 at 11:11 pmAnd as for the movie, it should be a character study of someone who has sacrificed everything – and I mean EVERYTHING – for his country, only to have become a fugitive from that country he once defended, with the movie questioning how does someone undo what has been done, get back what has been lost, and regain faith in a cause that has cost Jack dearly, damaged not only Jack himself but friends and family around him, but also one which now treats him as a criminal… a post-War on Terror movie with an embittered and broken Jack Bauer having to reconcile himself to the repercussions of his legacy as an anti-terrorist operative, repercussions that come back to bite when his hiding in exile is uncovered, and Jack has to defend not his country this time, but his very life…
David
May 12, 2020 at 4:34 amGuest
July 19, 2012 at 11:49 pmBMAN
July 20, 2012 at 2:32 amDavid
May 12, 2020 at 4:36 amGuest
July 20, 2012 at 3:04 am24bauerfan
July 20, 2012 at 7:32 amCatherine
July 20, 2012 at 8:25 amIMO 24 was not only a spy thriller/action series, but above all a character driven drama about a man who does his duty whatever it takes…24 is a philosophical reflexion about “does the end justifie the means ?” but 24 doesn’t give the answer. So it’s timeless and can be adapted to any political situation (not only War on Terror) in any country (there are enough wars all around the world !)
Besides is War on Terror over ?? I don’t think so…look at what happen in Middle East and North Africa. In France, 3 months ago, an islamist killed 3 kids in a jewish school…
So I think Jack Bauer is more than ever relevant.
Gerry Mander
July 22, 2012 at 9:25 pmJack Bauer is a wish-fulfillment, an idiom of our desires for those who govern us to also protect us by any means necessary, he personifies the relentless fight to stop evil men (and women) who would kill in the name of greed, power, and/or ideology, in that respect, he’s always relevant, whether FOX still holds that opinion of one of their most successful characters or not is open to question, however…
Dan
July 28, 2012 at 2:35 amI agree that the “Bush-era” style of 24 isn’t relevent anymore and it does need to change with the times. It needs to be far more realistic–not to the extent of The Wire (too big a change), but certainly to have more realistic and developed characters and situations.
oyebola
January 10, 2013 at 2:47 pm