TV Guide has a major spoiler about what caused Chloe O’Brian’s radical transformation in the upcoming miniseries.
When former CTU analyst Chloe O’Brian (Mary Lynn Rajskub) reconnects with Jack Bauer this May in Fox’s 24: Live Another Day, we will learn that she has lost her child. “Chloe feels responsible for what happened because it was a result of the secrets she knows,” says Rajskub, whose real-life son is 5 years old.
Due to her tragic loss, expect a much different Chloe, both mentally and physically. “She’s damaged, messed-up and heartbroken,” Rajskub says. “I’m talking to the hair and makeup people to find her new look. It’s got to be extreme but still Chloe.”
Prescott O’Brian was last seen in the DVD bonus feature “Chloe’s Arrest.” What do you think of this dark new direction for Chloe?
30 Comments
Comments Closed24marathonman
January 27, 2014 at 10:05 amCrisis892000
January 29, 2014 at 2:34 amJack attack
January 27, 2014 at 10:08 amTony Forever
January 27, 2014 at 4:32 pmChlojack
January 27, 2014 at 4:37 pm24marathonman
January 27, 2014 at 10:52 amXAM
January 27, 2014 at 11:45 amLovelovelove24
February 4, 2014 at 11:31 am24marathonman
January 27, 2014 at 10:55 am24 Spoilers
January 27, 2014 at 11:54 amNot sure how I feel about this yet. Having such a drastic character transformation happen off-screen and then tasking a comedic actress with delivering this type of super-serious/dramatic plot… It has the potential to go very poorly IMO.
XAM
January 27, 2014 at 12:48 pm*phew*
Anyway yes, you could be forgiven for thinking Mary Lynn is a shit actress, but if you’d cast your mind back to Edgar’s death it was mostly her who carried that powerful scene. So I’m excited about this new development with Chloe… this is coming from someone who’s wanted her gone since S6 and didn’t initially want her back for this. BUT since they’re doing something quite different with her – besides her being Jack and the writers cheat codes – then bring it on!
Jack attack
January 27, 2014 at 2:45 pm24 Spoilers
January 27, 2014 at 2:59 pmI think it’s fair to say she has a somewhat limited range, though. MLR is primarily a comedian – fantastic at delivering snarky comments and deadpan humor, but I don’t feel she’s proven herself as a dramatic actress just yet. I agree she did a very nice job on Edgar’s death scene, but this new storyline is asking for a lot more out of her.
(This comment isn’t intended as a knock on her, by the way. If someone is good at playing guitar but can’t play the drums, that doesn’t necessarily make them a shit musician for example.)
I’m excited that they’re doing something very different with this character for once, just not quite sure if MLR will be able to pull off such a challenging role. I’m cautiously optimistic.
DRod
January 27, 2014 at 11:14 amJack O'Brian
January 27, 2014 at 5:19 pmGerry Mander
January 27, 2014 at 7:22 pm24 Spoilers
January 27, 2014 at 9:21 pmBut truthfully there’s only so much that can be done. Once it airs in the States it’s out there and people will be talking and tweeting about it, sites will be posting reviews, actors will be doing interviews… And all that stuff will obviously be posted here too. There’s always going to be some viewers that are further behind than others, ultimately it’s up to each individual to be responsible for avoiding spoilers on the internet.
I don’t think having two separate articles for stories is practical, but if you have any other suggestions I’d be happy to consider everything. I’ll try to be careful with the headlines and thumbnail images and give warnings where possible, but this site *is* called “24 Spoilers” after all.
Gerry Mander
January 27, 2014 at 10:54 pm24bauerfan
January 28, 2014 at 5:23 pmWith information on already aired episodes, it’s a different ballgame all together. You should still try to be as non-spoilery as possible in the titles. E.g. a character dies, the next day the actor gives an interview, maybe you could post it just as (X actor interviewed on E! (SPOILER ALERT)). Maybe wait 24 hours after the show has aired before posting a “RIP [Character]” or a “Goodbye [character]” article.
With already aired episodes, you have more room and more cause to spoil, and I won’t criticize you if you do, but with unaired episodes, I think those are “real” spoilers which you should avoid at all costs from revealing in the titles.
24 Spoilers
January 28, 2014 at 7:12 pmI see how the title of this particular interview was a poor choice – I tried to be a bit more vague than “Prescott dies!” but it was still spoilery and I apologize.
Will attempt to be careful about this stuff, but sometimes it just won’t be possible – not every story will have several different image choices to pick from for example. I don’t feel it’s necessary to put warnings like “SPOILER ALERT” in headlines, since this is a spoiler website after all and one should assume that upcoming information will be discussed. But I will certainly try to be careful with headlines and images.
All I can say is that this site may be risky to visit if you want to be completely spoiler-free, especially after it begins airing in the US.
Adam J Bernay
March 29, 2014 at 10:46 pmTJ
January 28, 2014 at 1:03 amJudy Hendrixon
January 28, 2014 at 3:56 amWhat I don’t like is the fact that we have another major player, which she is if nothing else but by virtue of having Jack’s back for several seasons now, Chloe going dark is a wrong rabbit trail to go down. What the writers did to Jack with his going dark in Season 8 besides being very hard to watch that level of evil and malevelonce it was dispicable, unnecessary, frankly lazy assed script writing.
There was a lot of strong negative fan feedback on this and it was said earlier that everyone got the message. Now you’re going to turn around and despite it, fans be damned, do the very same thing with Chloe! Has everyone there lost their collective minds and sold their creative souls to the god of idiocy that by doing the same thing over and over and then expecting to actually get different results?! Someone please send in an intervention leader before this thing gets derailed.
24Nathan
January 28, 2014 at 9:09 pmSo yes, I guess in the grand scheme of things, we can look at a reused story for a character going dark as a boring rehash, but we can also look at the fact that it obviously is not impossible for someone to break, especially after experiencing severe emotional trauma. Look at Edward Snowden, he turned against the government to expose what they were doing. Jack (among other selfish reasons) turned swiftly against the government for their corrupt version of keeping the peace, and Chloe was beginning to see eye to eye to his reasons (though not his methods), so if, let’s say, the CIA or Russia nabbed Prescott and she hasn’t seen him since, then I would bet heavily that she doesn’t really like the government anymore. Even if it was the Russians that did it, than it is likely the US didn’t try very hard to help her since she was last seen as aiding a very wanted man.
Reused? Yes. Boring and unrealistic? No.
Catherine
January 29, 2014 at 4:21 amCatherine
January 29, 2014 at 4:24 amMary WIlson
January 29, 2014 at 10:15 pmscotta.
May 6, 2014 at 2:15 pmJohnny Blastoff
May 7, 2014 at 9:36 pmTrevor
May 12, 2014 at 10:34 pm